The idea of democracy is so that there is equality in our government system. As we all know, this is not true. Some jobs pay higher than others, some people have to work harder in their jobs, while some people are on the streets because they have been laid off. We all see a sense of unfairness, like teachers should be paid more because they are setting the future for our children; most CEO’s get paid the most in their business even though they do not understand much about the job they are looking over. If more Americans became self-less and took a stand for what is right and wrong in our economy we might get somewhere in the future of our democracy. “Like baseball, the politics of power offers structural advantages to players and teams with more assets” (Katznelson, pg. 383). Unlike baseball that can change without life consequences, politics can change, but will have more consequences on the lives and chances of Americans. If politics change and put everyone on the same salary no matter what their job is, there would be discretion in unfairness and inequality, and everyone would be on the same level. There would be not be rich or poor people, car companies would not have nice, expensive cars, everyone would have the same thing and life would probably be boring. This is why there is diversity in our economy, and sudden political changes can not necessarily happen.
Due to the decision of the Bush administration in 2003 on creating a structural change in the Department of Homeland Security, “The size and power of executive agencies concerned with safeguarding the country from the threat of terrorism expanded and transformed” (Katznelson, pg. 384). Politics is based on a structural foundation and building up. This structure can be changed and result in a change in society. “Such structural alterations and adjustments can be distinguished from intentional political activity aimed at protecting or changing the status quo” (Katznelson, pg. 385). With the thought that politics can change things at the drop of the hat, should encourage more people to stand up for their rights and realize that they could change the economy they live in if they dislike it. This could mean that less people would be agitated without government because they would be helping to make choices, too. On 9 news the other week, there was a mother who sent a letter to the president telling him if the government actually shut down they would be ruining children’s experiences to go to Washington D.C. Although I do not believe that this one letter did much to change anyone’s mind in the government, President Obama still acknowledged it in his speech meaning that he did listen. If more people took a stand, then we would probably have a better democracy for our future.
Katznelson, Ira, Kesselman, Mark, Draper, Alex. (2011). The Politics of Power, Capitalism and Democracy. pgs 383, 384, & 385. Norton & Company, New York.
9 News
9 News

